Category: reviews

my mom likes it!

and i am unabashedly pleased!

okay, so, yeah, she’s my mom, of course she’ll be proud of what i do, and appreciate the work that went into it and all, but she called me tonight to tell me she just put her reader’s copy of No Good Deed down for the first time since she picked it up three days ago. obviously not literally, but she said it pulled her along so completely that she wanted to call me to tell me how much she was enjoying it, but she didn’t want to stop reading long enough to do that. and she didn’t even need to take notes!*

of course, she had some questions, partly because of the speed she read it at so she’s going to re-read a bit, but come on, how incredibly cool is that?

thanks, mom!

* as was understandably necessary for Witness. the difference between the two experiences, then, i’m going to consider an indication of my ability to expand as a writer. that’s my story and i’m sticking to it.

best rejection ever!

earlier this year, i submit Witness to an annual international self-published book contest. yesterday, just a few days before christmas, i received notice that i hadn’t won. this, in itself, is okay; disaappointing, obviously, but okay. i’m certain there were quite a few very strong contenders (the letter even said so – “Competition was particularly fierce this year” – so it had to be true), and i learn from my mistakes and all that. so, that was fine.

the notification itself came in one of those stiff-backed full-sized envelopes so the pages are un-folded and all, and included the aforementioned letter, a cardstock certificate of participation in the contest, a couple photocopied pages of book marketing and promotion tips, and judge’s comments on my work.

now, let me say that i did pay $50 to be included in the contest, which is i suppose the reason for the more formal presentation of the notification; however, why on earth would i want a certificate to commemorate the fact that i hadn’t won something?*

okay, i can hear you asking: ‘what’s so ‘best’ about this rejection?’

well, i’ll tell you:

as i mentioned, i received comments from the judge (#32) that read my book. the following is an exact copy of the commentary i received, word for word:

Plot: 4
Grammar: 5
Character Development: 4
Cover Design: 3

Judge’s commentary:

What did you like best about this book?
The back cover copy is strong and compelling. After reading it, I was eager to open the book and start reading. After the opening hook, I couldn’t put down the book. With a well thought out plot and scene after scene of fabulous dialogue and active narrative, Witness is sure to have readers begging for more from author Bill Blais. The story starts at a good point and has a strong sense of movement, with all of the events unfolding in a logical yet unexpected manner. The characters are strong and sympathetic, even with their flaws. They speak naturally, and ring true to who they are. The authro voice is strong without being intrusive or overpowering to the story.

How can the author improve this book?
The front cover is okay, but it doesn’t offer a strong enough hint of the wonderful tale inside. With a story this powerful, the author might consider revising the cover for future printings. Take a look at other covers in the bookstore and see what jumps out – then do one better. There isn’t much else I’d change about this book, other than perhaps add a stronger hook at the end of all the chapters. Most of them have a light hook, so this really isn’t necessary. It would just strengthen it enough to take it from very good to excellent. Marketing this book would be a joy. There are all sorts of online book groups that would be eager to hear from the author for a chat or interview. Libraries and bookstores are other great places to ask about reader groups.

and this is the rejection letter? wow. (for reference, the numerics were based on a 1-5/low-high scale) obviously, i’m thrilled to hear all these fabulous things about my work, and i even understand where the judge is coming from about the cover art. it’s decidely not like the other books on the shelf, and it might do better with a more typically ‘fantastic’ cover. i’m not thrilled about that bit, and i don’t want to agree because of what it says about us as readers, but i can see the point.

that bit aside, though, my book is apparently bloody awesome.

just not good enough.

all my general snarkiness aside, though, i do want to be clear: i am genuinely and seriously thankful for this commentary, and i do appreicate that there are probably hundreds of books vying for the top spot in the genre fiction category. even as a rejection, this still ranks as extremely high praise, and it gives a little boost to the ego, if i do say so myself.

*worse, still, my name was off-center. i mean, come on, if you’re going to go to do a job, do it right. it’s the little things, folks, the little things…

rule #4: have faith in yourself

it’s so easy to get down on myself, sometimes, as my previous post shows. very frustrating. and yet, it’s just as easy to get back up.

not that there wasn’t something to be put out about, though. monday, i hadn’t written anything, and tuesday i barely made 3 pages , and was unhappy with 1 of them. i went to bed on tuesday wallowing in the despair of not having any skill at this writing thing, and what am i really trying to prove, anyway… moreover, despite the total fabulosity of the bookfetish.org review that lifted me higher than a kite on monday, i remembered on tuesday that i had received another agent rejection letter for Witness last week, only futhering my downward spiral.

wednesday didn’t help a lot, count-wise. i only managed 2 pages, and i was still carrying 3 pages over from monday, leaving me 4 pages behind.

but today was an entirely different story (ha! get it? *sigh*). the 2 pages from yesterday got me around an obstacle, and today i ran with it, cranking out 7 pages, as of 5 minutes ago. a good day. AND i managed to water the garden and do a load of darks and whites, too!*

and how did all this happen? because, with help from my wife/muse, i remembered that i don’t believe i’m terrible at this writing thing, that i have a chance, and that i will continue.

when i started to tell her about the difficult storyline problem i’d been stuck on earlier this week, i realized i’d already fixed it. i also realized that wednesday’s work, while less than i’d desired, more than made up for it by revealing this solution. i had identified that i was forcing it, and i went through the steps to re-approach the issue, until i found the one that worked.

i believed i could do it, and i did it. it’s that simple. and that hard.

in regards to the rejection letter, it finally occurred to me that i had opened it in the middle of last week, but not really given it a second thought until my slump on tuesday. yes, it’s a rejection. so what? i had clearly forgotten rule #2. also, i have sent a note to another agent who requested an exclusive review of a partial some time ago, so this rejection actually frees me up to contact this other agent!

so, here i am, back on track (83% !!!), thrilled to be here, and sincerely hoping to actually learn some of these rules some day.

* well, the clothes still need to be folded, but they’re all washed and dried.

writing away, friendship renewed, plus some cool news for next week

today was another good day. not as good as i’d hoped, as i let myself start a little later than expected, but i got a good 5 pages written. i’m pretty sure there’s some bloat in this bit, but that’s okay for now. i’m enjoying how the flow is working.

i’ve been trying to update the word/page counts in the sidebar daily, and i pulled the chapter count, as it’s totally irrelevant at this point. i’m identifying better chapter demarcations regularly, and looking ahead i can see that the last several chapters are actually a series of smaller scenes in a single chapter, or something to that effect. it’s also the least relevant marker, so dropping it is okay.

i also spent the afternoon with a good friend i haven’t seen in at least 5 years. she found me here in the last six months, and we finally managed to meet up again. it was great to see her, and it was one of those blessed situations where we just slipped back into conversation without so much as a pause. i say again, i am a very fortunate person.

of course, she’s read the book, and while she maintains her differences of opinion, it was great to hear her talk about what worked and didn’t work for her and how excited she was about it. not only for the obvious ego boost, but also for the ability to have a face to face conversation about several aspects of the book. it brings up an interesting question about how much to say about the book and how much to leave un-’answered’ (which assumes that, as i’m the author, i have the answers, which i sometimes wonder about). but that is a topic for another day.

and no, i tried not to monopolize our first meeting with talk about my book (though you’ll have to ask her about the truth of that).

oh, and the last bit of news is that i learned last evening that Witness will be reviewed under the Alternate Worlds spotlight section of bookfetish.org (whose motto, i believe, used to be: ‘gagging on bad prose, so you don’t have to’, which was both disturbing and hilarious at the same time – the newer taglines are good, though, and easier to…swallow?) next friday, august 29th! it’s a good site with a growing focus on the underdogs, the less popular authors, the diamonds in the rough, if you will. as for the review itself, i don’t know much more than they seemed to like it very much, so i’m excited for the 29th, as well! be sure to check them out at the link above. i’ve already picked out a few books to check out, myself, from their reviews.

how cool is that?

okay, i’ve been mostly complaining lately, so here’s something different.

near the end of april, i sent a copy of Witness to an online fantasy/sf book review blog who said they’d be interested in giving it a go, but apparently the package never arrived. i got distracted in the intervening time, however, and never followed up*, and i would have missed the chance completely if the blogger hadn’t emailed me yesterday to ask about the book, noting that the book had never arrived.

how cool is that? the blogger contacted me to ask about the book. even cooler, the blogger asked if i wanted to send it along again, as there was still interest reading it; to which i responded something vaguely more intelligent than “well, duh!” before racing out to the post office.

not to put too much into it, but this is just one of those things that feels great to be impacted by, and i am thankful. restores the faith in the human race and all that. (i’m not mentioning the blog/blogger by name as i’m not sure whether there might be some interpretation of obligation for review or whatever and though i tend to overthink such things, i’d rather err on the side of caution. anyway, the blog in question is one of the book review blogs on my sidebar, so share the love and give them all a visit.)

* the vast majority of my mailings (review copies/manuscripts/query letters) are within the US and i use the Priority Mail envelope, plus the delivery confirmation, so i don’t have to pester folks. however, for international mailings, like this blog, the USPS doesn’t do delivery confirmation, so i have to remember to touch base with these folks after a couple weeks.

good review at amazon

a good review has appeared on amazon.com, and while there are some downsides, the reviewer goes so far as to compare elements of my style to Glen Cook, which is is clearly an enormous ego boost, thank you very much!

so, here i am again, at the top of the rollercoaster. a common misconception of my zodiac sign, libra, is the belief that we are balanced and stable individuals.

pfiffle.

being a libra, at least for me, is being always in search of equilibirium. as a result, i’m never quite there. case in point: my previous post. saddling myself with the familiar weight of self-pity, i bemoaned the fact that the store i was hoping to have a booksigning at was going out of business. a few days later i discover this review (which, in fact, was posted the day before the book store news) and voila, validation once more.

what i have learned, however, is that the rollercoaster costs extra. what that means is…well, honestly, i don’t know what that means; it just sounded clever.

what i do know, though, is the experience with the bookstore would have been something to knock me out of the game, some years ago. i would’ve taken it as a sign or some other foolishness, and buried my head back in work and self-pity. now, though, what i most took away from that discovery (once i got past the moment, of course; i’m human) was the fact that i’d let the unimportant things clutter my view and fill my days.

i am never so bloody busy that i can’t spend five minutes writing, nor am i so busy that i can’t make a call to a store and set up a signing, particularly one with a manager who was so clearly willing to help. i made this happen, as much by what i didn’t do as what i did.

so there’s the lesson: stop wasting time.

when i’m on my game, i feel like i could write without stopping until i breathe my last breath and not get all the stories out of my head. when i’m not on my game, i have sheaf after sheaf, drawer after drawer, and file after file of story ideas scrawled down to keep me busy. (of course, i’m the first to admit not all those ideas are worth sharing, but you get the point) either way, i’m an idiot for stopping.

so, i started again, and you’ll see more of it here very soon.

new review at Dark Wolf Fantasy Reviews

this weekend i received a review over at Dark Wolf Fantasy Reviews. a number of items didn’t work for Dark Wolf, but again, this is all about seeing the positive and negative, and I’m thankful for the honest commentary and the clarity around what didn’t work and why.

Kirkus Discoveries lead item!

yes, it’s been quiet here. don’t get me started. anyway, hit a bright spot in my email last night, when i received the Kirkus Discoveries Newsletter for May, and there, at the top of the list, was Witness!

the review is the same as I listed elsewhere, but now it’s out on their site, all official-like!

Check it out!